Best Returns of the Year Lure ‘Believers’ to Clean-Energy ETFs

This post was originally published on this site
© Reuters. Best Returns of the Year Lure ‘Believers’ to Clean-Energy ETFs© Reuters. Best Returns of the Year Lure ‘Believers’ to Clean-Energy ETFs

(Bloomberg) — Exchange-traded fund investors are finally paying attention to clean-energy stocks thanks to a market-beating year.

The $439 million Invesco Solar ETF, known by its ticker TAN, has returned 58% this year, outperforming all other unleveraged ETFs in the U.S., according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s spurred the most demand for the fund in five years, with more than $60 million flowing in last quarter.

Despite a recent bout of weakness, clean-energy stocks have been on a tear as tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on imported solar equipment gradually decline. Meanwhile, the outlook for greater use of renewables has also improved, further burnishing the appeal of companies like First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:)., one of TAN’s largest holdings.

“It’s finally gaining some believers,” Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Eric Balchunas said of the ETF.

Two other clean-energy funds are also among the year’s top 10 performers through Sept. 30: The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (NYSE:) and State Street Corp (NYSE:).’s SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF both returned 38%.

But price gains aren’t solely responsible for investor interest. Renewables have become a mainstream energy source, supplying more power to America’s grid than coal for the first time ever in April. Solar and wind are now the cheapest forms of power in two-thirds of the world. Meanwhile, the Solar Energy Industries Association recently said the U.S. pipeline for utility-scale projects had reached 37.9 gigawatts, a record.

In fact, newcomers to clean energy missed much of the sector’s advance this year, with TAN’s performance in the first half of 2019 significantly outpacing its return in the third quarter.

However, it’s easy to understand buyers’ caution when you look at the fund’s history: Despite this year’s advance, TAN has lost 85% since it began trading in April 2008.

“Because there’s some maturation of the industry, that could reduce some of the volatility going forward,” said Todd Rosenbluth, director of ETF research at CFRA Research. “While we think prospects for many of these companies are favorable, these products are not for the faint of heart.”

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.