Britain's Burford takes legal action to get share data from LSE

This post was originally published on this site
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The London Stock Exchange Group offices are seen in the City of London, Britain© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The London Stock Exchange Group offices are seen in the City of London, Britain

By Simon Jessop

LONDON (Reuters) – Burford Capital (L:) began legal action on Monday against the London Stock Exchange (L:) seeking trading data it said it needs to investigate alleged manipulation of its share price.

Burford raised concerns about trading activity on Aug. 12 after a sharp fall in its shares, alleging ‘spoofing’ and ‘layering’, where traders make and cancel orders to influence share prices, and said it was investigating.

A spokesperson for the LSE was not immediately able to comment when contacted by Reuters about the legal action by litigation financing specialist Burford.

London-listed Burford last month commissioned a report from Columbia University academic and data analyst Joshua Mitts to assess publicly available market data on its shares.

Burford’s lawyer Richard East of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, said in court documents that the report by Mitts showed there were “strong grounds to consider that a large proportion of the decline in Burford’s share price was the consequence of unlawful trading activity known as ‘spoofing’ and ‘layering'”.

“This share price decline coincided with a short selling attack on Burford’s shares carried out by Muddy Waters Capital LLC,” East said in the documents seen by Reuters.

Carson Block, founder of Muddy Waters, denied any involvement in a statement on Monday.

“Spoofing and layering are issues that have arisen in the high frequency and computer-driven trading world, and Muddy Waters has zero capability to engage in these practices,” he said.

Burford said it wants the court to help it discover which individuals and entities placed the orders, and on behalf of whom, to help determine what was legitimate trading and what may have constituted market abuse.

That level of data is commercially sensitive and not currently in the public domain, hence the need for Burford to apply for court approval to access the data.

Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority said on Aug. 12 it was making “wide-ranging enquiries” into the circumstances surrounding the Muddy Waters report.

The FCA declined to comment on the case on Monday.

After falling 42% from Aug. 6 to the close on Friday, Burford stock jumped to a session high of 843.5 pence after its statement on Monday. By 1330 GMT, the shares were up 3.7%.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.